The feature presented editing suggestions designed to emulate the style of journalists, authors, or other writers without their permission.

Using recognizable names to give your AI feature credibility without asking permission is a bad idea.

Journalist Julia Angwin is leading a class action lawsuit against Grammarly for violating her privacy and publicity rights.

Feature generated editing suggestions inspired by well-known authors and academics, prompting a class-action lawsuit over the use of real names without consent ...

A recently-added feature in Grammarly purports to improve users’ writing with help from the world's great writers and ...

Grammarly faces a class action lawsuit over its AI Expert Review tool, which is accused of using real experts’ identities to write feedback without consent.

Shishir Mehrotra, CEO of Grammarly's owner Superhuman, has announced that the company is "disabling" a feature that impersonated journalists.

Julia Angwin, an investigative journalist formerly of the Wall Street Journal, took the next step and launched a lawsuit. “I have worked for decades honing my skills as a writer and editor, and I am ...

The feature, which Grammarly shut down Wednesday, presented editing suggestions as if they came from established authors and academics—without their consent.

Popular writing assistant, Grammarly, has disabled its highly controversial ‘Expert Review’ feature after the tool received ...

The AI-generated feedback included comments that appeared to be from The Verge’s editor-in-chief, Nilay Patel, as well as ...

Grammarly faces a class-action lawsuit after its AI "Expert Review" feature allegedly used writers' identities without ...