The File Replication Service (FRS) has a justifiably bad reputation for bugginess and indecipherable logs. But recent changes from Redmond make it worth another look.

It's time to ditch File Replication Service and move completely to Distributed File System.

There are lots of ways of sharing files online, through a web portal or a file replication service that keeps your files synchronized with those you want to share with clients or collaborators ...

3 DCs in 3 sites.All Win2k with sp3.I've been asked to fix some network problems that the admin can't figure out. The number one problem is File Replication. None of the DCs will replicate files ...

Adding replication to FlashBlade will help the line better compete with Dell EMC's Isilon, NetApp, Qumulo, and other file-based systems, Asmussen said.

Previous versions of Windows Server relied on the file replication service to move files between servers. In R2, DFS replication also replicates data stored on distributed servers, but adds ...

Windows Server 2003 will reach its end next summer, and with it the operating system's File Replication Service.

Quantum has upgraded its StorNext scale-out file system with the addition of replication between discrete instances of the environment and shared access to a single repository for dispersed teams ...

As a result, most of my replication has stopped performing. I have a total of 4 file servers, 3 of which are at R2 SP1, the last one being SP2.

The File Replication Service (FRS) has a justifiably bad reputation for bugginess and indecipherable logs. But recent changes from Redmond make it worth another look.